A three-judge panel permanently blocked Alabama from using a state-drawn map that they said flouted their directive to draw a plan that was fair to Black voters.

A federal court ruled Thursday that Alabama engaged in intentional discrimination when it refused to draw a congressional plan with a second Black majority district after courts, including the Supreme ...

A federal court ruled that the congressional district map drawn by the Alabama legislature was unconstitutional, ordering ...

The three-judge panel said it would consider a motion from plaintiffs to subject future congressional districting in Alabama to preclearance.

The court ruled Alabama's map violates the Voting Rights Act, ensuring continued use of a court-ordered map enabling two ...

The court-ordered map, used in the 2024 elections, resulted in Alabama electing two Black representatives to Congress for the first time in history.

A federal court ruling in Alabama could mean another new congressional map for the state, as a panel of federal judges found ...

The NAACP Legal Defense Fund has won a victory at the Supreme Court against Alabama's discriminatory redistricting practices ...

A federal appeals court that already has said private individuals and groups cannot sue under a key part of the federal ...

Court Rules Alabama Violated Voting Rights Act in Drawing Congressional ... injunction that ordered it,” they wrote. The Thursday ruling came after a February trial over the state map.

A federal court says Alabama can't use a congressional map it found unconstitutional. The ruling comes in a voting rights ...

The state has not been subject to preclearance since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2013 ruling in another key voting rights case out of Alabama — Shelby County v. Holder. "It is my hope that this ...